This post is an excerpt from Changing Results by Changing Behavior, a leadership field guide by Julie Poland:
You might think that measurement of results would be a foregone
conclusion ─ everyone does it, right?
That’s not been our experience.
Sure, leaders take a look at certain numbers like gross revenue, gross
profit, cash balances and the like, but far fewer have a grip on measurement
beyond that.
When there are hard dollar reasons to pursue behavior change it’s
natural that hard dollar measurements should result. If you engage someone to work with your sales
staff you would expect to see movement in sales per rep, perhaps an increase in
the number of presentations, or in their closing percentages. Where you set concrete financial benchmarks
at the beginning of your process you’ve set the stage for measuring the
downstream effectiveness of your change efforts.
When you define the most appropriate measurements,
you can more readily define the interim goals or behaviors that should lead to
them. Continuing with the sales example,
what behavior changes would your reps need to make to close more sales? Do they need to redefine their “ideal
prospects?” Do they need to learn more
effective communication techniques to use during the sales process? When you define expectations in specific
terms, you help whatever outside resource you’re using (we’ll call it your
improvement partner) to tailor a process that directly addresses your
situation. The resulting process is more likely to help your people produce the
desired results.
Communicating
Success Measures when You Start
It’s
important, when measuring progress, to tell the participants what the targets
are before they start. You (or the
highest-ranking executive you can access) should personally participate in the
project kickoff, setting the scene by laying out some performance goals. When
you choose to do this:- Participants realize that this isn’t in addition to their job, or tangential to their job ─ it is their job.
- You create an umbrella under which participants can set their individual goals as the process progresses.
- Participants will be able to help you achieve the results you want by addressing the piece that they can impact from their corner of your organization.
Levels
of Measurement
You might be interested in finding out your
employees’ reactions to whatever
development or project-focused process you have involved them in, but that
really only gives you a superficial view.
Reactions relate more to whether they liked the facilitator, the room
and the snacks than whether the process was effective. Yes, it does help to have an engaging facilitator,
an accommodating space, etc. But it
takes more to evaluate the value of your investment.
You might also want to know about the amount of learning they acquired during training
efforts. You can incorporate pre- and post-training exams if you want to
increase the accountability for each person to participate fully in gaining the
information they need to know. One
potentially undesirable side effect of content exams is that they can create
the misperception that the primary goal is to obtain knowledge. That’s not it ─ the change you seek may
require a knowledge-download component, but ultimately application of knowledge is what creates the behavior change.
Your two most important categories of measurement will come from
the behavior changes people make and
the new results they achieve. You and your improvement partner will be
double-teaming during the change process, with your facilitator providing the
tools and processes and you providing the support, context, alignment and
accountability for your employees. (You
can see why it is advantageous to start with your senior leaders, so you can
spread the responsibility around as you go through your company!)
Measuring
Behavior Change
The simplest method my colleagues and I use to measure behavior
change is the implementation of behavior-related
goals. In an earlier chapter I cited
the example of the supervisor in saying “Good morning” every morning. Behavioral goals can be tricky in that people
will try to commit themselves to a major “go forth and sin no more” expectation
─ an ad infinitum standard that is difficult to sustain. It’s preferable to keep the behavior narrow
and specific and the early time frames short to create the opportunity for
success. For example:
- Each day this week I will plan the next day’s tasks before I leave the office.
- For today I will ask questions so I better understand the other person’s point rather than dig in and argue my point of view.
- I will distribute a written agenda no later than 48 hours prior to the Friday staff meeting.
There are few goals too small to start the process of behavior
change, as long as they meet the SMART criteria (specific, measurable,
achievable yet realistically high, and time-deadline stated). Each has just a small impact, but together
they create a critical mass of positive momentum. In general terms, more difficult behavioral
change goals should carry shorter time frames to keep them realistic. You can evaluate your success on each goal
and renew it if you want to refine your approach or commit to an additional
segment of time.






